Is there a security/performance downside to letting HTML through? Because I don't think there are many non-html email clients left out there now.
I know that spamassassin gives negative points to email which is only html. It thinks that is a Bad Sign, and that good mail should be multipart with plaintext and html versions - but it isn't a fatal problem, just something that contributes towards an overall score.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ælfred se leof via Selenetest
The To address looks good, encoding is worse!
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, 10:53 Ælfred se leof via Selenetest,
wrote: .0pt;word-wrap:break-word"> Some bo= ld =C2=A0and italic text. =C2=A0
">Some
">Dot= ">Points :p> =C2=A0 A non-ASCI= I character: =C3=86 =C2=A0 =E2=80=9CS= mart=E2=80=9D quotes and greengrocers=E2=80=99 apostrophe=E2=80=99s. _______________________________________________ Selenetest mailing list -- selenetest@lochac.sca.org To unsubscribe send an email to selenetest-leave@lochac.sca.org or manage your subscription via the web interface at https://mailman.lochac.sca.org/postorius/lists/selenetest.lochac.sca.org