I don't mind this, but I'm worried about announce. I would like a setting
there that says "all replies are moderated" because we would like to NOT
moderate some people . and that makes replies our curse. Can we use the
reply-to setting in the list? I would like announce to be reply-to: the
shambles . is that a suitable alternative?
Sorle
From: selenetest@lochac.sca.org
Sent: Wednesday, 9 April 2025 9:16 AM
To: selenetest@lochac.sca.org
Subject: [Selenetest] Re: Test three - anonymous list
Houston, I suspect we have a winner.
The message makes it to my gmail account with all headers showing google is
happy with the authentication. The only sender shown, and the only place I
can send a reply, is the list itself. If we turn this setting on for most
of our lists, the messages should get to everyone, and:
With lochac-announce, anyone attempting to reply will go to the list and be
moderated according to its rules
For pelicans, etc, replies will go the list and thus all members
For group lists, like ynys-fawr, it will be up to the moderators to decide.
It means that you can't see from the sender details who posted the original
message to the list (it doesn't appear as coming from nico via selenetest,
just from selenetest), but that is possibly a good thing. Provided people
sign their messages with their names, which I am pretty sure they generally
do, this would work.
J / N
From: selenetest@lochac.sca.org mailto:selenetest@lochac.sca.org
mailto:selenetest@lochac.sca.org >
Sent: Wednesday, 9 April 2025 9:00 AM
To: selenetest@lochac.sca.org mailto:selenetest@lochac.sca.org
Subject: [Selenetest] Test three - anonymous list
Personalize is set back to 'off', anonymous list is set on.
